HubMI.plSelf-submittedNot a finalist (self-declared)

AI Konik

AI Konik Dev · michalwilk123/aikonik

Council score

Median of 3 models, weighted by the task's official criteria
82.0 / 100

An unusually complete and genuinely working build of all seven HubMI modules with real AI matchmaking over the ROPS catalog and production-grade deployment, held back by the missing numeric cost estimate, a reinterpreted tester module and unverified WCAG compliance.

Criteria · line = median, dots = each member
Challenge fulfilment40%
8.5

All seven modules exist in code with UI, and the mandatory matchmaking genuinely retrieves cited matches from the 115-entry ROPS catalog in D1; on the dispute over documentation language, the majority view and the Polish PDFs in the repo support B and C over A's claim of English docs. The median sides with A and C against B's 9.5 because the required numeric cost estimate is missing, the tester module drafts pilot plans without tester sign-up, rating or feedback, and admin need-trend aggregation is absent.

Implementation potential20%
7.5

The build is production-minded and live: Cloudflare Workers with nine D1 migrations, Payload with role-based auth, rate limiting, idempotent submissions and CI/CD to a working demo. It loses points because the cost estimate has no numbers and there is no load or production-scale evidence.

Accessibility & intuitiveness20%
8.0

Accessibility work is verifiable in the code, with a keyboard-operable SVG map, aria attributes, a skip link, simple Polish copy and a stated WCAG 2.1 AA target. C's 7 is too strict given that A and B both confirmed the code-level effort, but the lack of any audit or user testing keeps this below the top.

Bonus (UI, materials, MVP quality)20%
8.5

Strong materials and MVP quality: 133 tests in 43 files, a 10-slide Polish deck, a video, custom illustrations and a deployed demo. Mockups are screenshots of the built app rather than design mockups, which caps the score slightly.

Source lines21,872
Tests133 cases
Claims built9.0 / 10
Task fitYes

Strengths

  • All seven required modules are implemented in code with backend and UI, not mockups
  • Matchmaking is real: an agent with read-only tools retrieves cited matches from the 115-innovation ROPS catalog imported into D1
  • Production-grade engineering: live Cloudflare Worker, D1 migrations, role-based auth, rate limiting, idempotent submissions, CI/CD and 133 tests
  • Polish throughout the UI, deck and video, with concrete accessibility work visible in the code

Weaknesses

  • Missing the required numeric estimate of running and maintenance costs, a submission requirement all three members confirm is unmet
  • Innovation tester module is reinterpreted as pilot-plan drafting with no tester sign-up, rating or feedback collection
  • No need-trend aggregation for administrators even though chat telemetry is stored
  • WCAG 2.1 AA is a stated target with no audit or user-testing evidence, and mockups are app screenshots rather than design mockups
Built during the event: yes: 46 commits by 1 author, 2026-10-03 14:02 to 2026-10-04 08:18 UTC
Live demo: https://aikonik.michalwilk139.workers.dev/ (HTTP 200); https://aikonik.michalwilk139.workers.dev/admin (HTTP 200)
Council v9
Aclaude:glm-5.3-flash82.0100% agree
Bdots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free88.080% agree
Cinclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-sante:free77.070% agree
Jclaude:glm-5.3–judge
Self-submitted and unverified: the result shown is the team's own claim. The council read an evidence pack built from the repo, its decks and docs; it didn't run the code or see the pitch.
The site is open source

The council, the evidence pack, the prompts and the queue are all on GitHub. If a review helped you, a star helps other teams find it.

Star on GitHub