An unusually complete and genuinely working build of all seven HubMI modules with real AI matchmaking over the ROPS catalog and production-grade deployment, held back by the missing numeric cost estimate, a reinterpreted tester module and unverified WCAG compliance.
All seven modules exist in code with UI, and the mandatory matchmaking genuinely retrieves cited matches from the 115-entry ROPS catalog in D1; on the dispute over documentation language, the majority view and the Polish PDFs in the repo support B and C over A's claim of English docs. The median sides with A and C against B's 9.5 because the required numeric cost estimate is missing, the tester module drafts pilot plans without tester sign-up, rating or feedback, and admin need-trend aggregation is absent.
The build is production-minded and live: Cloudflare Workers with nine D1 migrations, Payload with role-based auth, rate limiting, idempotent submissions and CI/CD to a working demo. It loses points because the cost estimate has no numbers and there is no load or production-scale evidence.
Accessibility work is verifiable in the code, with a keyboard-operable SVG map, aria attributes, a skip link, simple Polish copy and a stated WCAG 2.1 AA target. C's 7 is too strict given that A and B both confirmed the code-level effort, but the lack of any audit or user testing keeps this below the top.
Strong materials and MVP quality: 133 tests in 43 files, a 10-slide Polish deck, a video, custom illustrations and a deployed demo. Mockups are screenshots of the built app rather than design mockups, which caps the score slightly.
claude:glm-5.3-flash82.0100% agreedots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free88.080% agreeinclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-sante:free77.070% agreeclaude:glm-5.3–judgeThe council, the evidence pack, the prompts and the queue are all on GitHub. If a review helped you, a star helps other teams find it.