An unusually complete, honest and well-engineered accessibility passport that meets nearly every hard requirement of the brief, held back by an unpriced business model, narrow seed-data coverage and an unverifiable video deliverable.
Verdicts are computed per profile from real dimensions (door width, threshold tolerance, toilet needs) across four states, and missing data renders as 'Brak danych' or 'Nie można potwierdzić', never as accessible. Real accessibility controls (text sizing, high contrast, skip link, keyboard and screen-reader support) are present, but the map has no explicit text alternative.
The live HTTP 200 demo matches the code, with map search, evidence passport, community reports, owner claims, admin moderation and an AI audit wizard with a manual fallback, plus the required conflicting, unreviewed and source-failure cases and 266 tests with Playwright axe. Points are lost because the referenced 2:49 walkthrough video cannot be verified in the submission.
Members disagree here: scores range by 2.0 points.Every datum carries source, method, observedAt and note, with source weights, time decay and conflict handling implemented in domain code, and the OSM Overpass and ZTP GTFS ingestion is real with attribution. The deployed demo runs on clearly labelled seed data, coverage is one central Kraków bbox, and no city MSIP or dane.gov.pl feed is actually consumed.
Ingestion is cleanly separated from presentation through a Repo interface with memory and Supabase backends and admin-triggered, logged runs. The Kraków bbox and attribute mapping are code constants, so adding a city needs code edits rather than configuration.
Four plausible segments are named (free venues, premium chains, B2G city licences, booking-platform API), but no PLN pricing, cost or revenue figure appears anywhere in the deck, README or form, which the criterion explicitly requires.
claude:glm-5.3-flash78.590% agreedots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free76.090% agreeinclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-sante:free70.070% agreeclaude:glm-5.3–judgeThe council, the evidence pack, the prompts and the queue are all on GitHub. If a review helped you, a star helps other teams find it.