Portugalskie Armatki Śnieżne · portugalskie-armatki-sniezne/eHackYeah2026
An unusually deep, honestly evaluated and publicly deployed municipal reporting platform whose remaining gaps are the missing deck, a notification loop that stops at a test inbox, roughly 81 percent routing accuracy on synthetic data, and a single-region scope.
Members converge: routing each report to the competent institution via AI classification plus nearest-seat geospatial matching, clustering duplicates into master cases, and hybrid vector search over the ROPS innovations catalog is genuine urban-process insight. The civic-reporting concept itself is not novel, and measured routing accuracy is only about 81 percent on synthetic data.
All three agree the project is deeply municipal, with real GUGiK ULDK and UUG integration, TERYT codes and the ROPS catalog serving both residents and office staff, and no reframing from another domain. The evidence of real Polish public-data plumbing supports the 9 over C's lone 8.
A public deployment with a demo account, bilingual UI and onboarding tour is usable today. But the service is locked to Małopolskie with Krakow mock data, about one in five reports would be misrouted at the measured accuracy, and no real email reaches an office.
Unanimous: a polished custom-styled MapLibre map with clustered status-colored pins, 3D buildings, accessibility handling and full Polish-English switching. The described screenshots cover teasers and mock photos, so the rendered live UI is only evidenced through the code.
The measured facts side with A and B over C's 6: 28,740 SLOC across services, 306 tests in 38 files, 14 migrations, CI with in-build classifier checks, and a readiness-gated public deploy are real implemented value. The mocked mail loop, CPU-only model and missing deck are true gaps but do not outweigh a tested, deployed stack.
Members disagree here: scores range by 3.0 points.claude:glm-5.3-flash79.5100% agreedots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free78.090% agreeinclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-sante:free71.060% agreeclaude:glm-5.3–judgeThe council, the evidence pack, the prompts and the queue are all on GitHub. If a review helped you, a star helps other teams find it.