Smart CitySelf-submittedNot a finalist (self-declared)

Wypadowo

Stowarzyszenie Wspierające Cyfryzację · SWCyfryzacje/hackyeah2026

Council score

Median of 3 models, weighted by the task's official criteria
69.0 / 100

A genuinely working, well-engineered Krakow walking companion with real routing, real open-data pipelines and careful privacy design, whose deck promises weather, traffic and matchmaking features the code does not deliver.

Criteria · line = median, dots = each member
Idea & Innovation30%
6.5

The loop generator is real algorithmic work, scoring ellipse candidates on road reuse and enclosed area, with cultural events injectable as route stops. The mood-adaptive, weather- and traffic-aware planning that B credits exists only in the deck, so the implemented innovation earns a mid score.

Members disagree here: scores range by 3.0 points.
Relation to Category20%
8.0

It is genuinely a city tool rather than a reframed product: walking loops, recreation and monument layers and Krakow cultural events target everyday urban life. C's demand for a city-operations angle is not in the brief, so A and B's view of open city data serving residents is better supported.

Members disagree here: scores range by 4.5 points.
Practical Applicability / Usability20%
6.5

Named users are served by real pipelines, with an installable Android APK and test-login instructions. But weather, live traffic and mood matching are absent from the code, and with no demo checks and no described screenshots, day-to-day usability rests on code alone, which undercuts B's 9.

Members disagree here: scores range by 3.0 points.
Design (visual/UI)20%
6.0

The code shows real design effort, including a hand-tuned light map style and consistent card components, but all 7 screenshots went undescribed, so B's polished-and-verified view cannot be confirmed. The score reflects code-inferred quality plus a mixed Polish and English UI.

Members disagree here: scores range by 3.5 points.
Completeness & Implementation Value10%
8.5

12,591 SLOC with 97 commits all inside the event window, real OSRM routing, RLS with security-definer RPCs, realtime with polling fallbacks, cron jobs and a reported 173-check RLS suite. The Krakow events scraper is not visible in the repo and measured unit test cases are zero, keeping it below the top.

Members disagree here: scores range by 2.5 points.
Source lines12,591
Tests1 files
Claims built7.5 / 10
Task fitYes

Strengths

  • Core capability is computed, not simulated: OSRM routing plus a custom loop generator scored on road reuse and enclosed area, with along-route recreation and events queries in the database.
  • Real urban data pipelines: a rate-limited LocationIQ/OSM tile sweep on pg_cron fills recreation areas, and a Krakow events table is wired into routes.
  • Unusually disciplined backend for a hackathon: RLS on new tables, security-definer RPCs, last-position-only location deleted on finish, a consent dialog and a reported 173-check RLS test script.
  • A real deliverable: an installable Android APK, 12,591 SLOC and 97 commits all falling inside the event window.

Weaknesses

  • The deck presents weather with AI, live-traffic awareness, mood and interests matchmaking, photo-verified reviews and smart notifications as features, but no matching code appears in the repo.
  • The krakow.pl events scraper is not visible in the submitted source, only the events table and cron references, so the headline data feed is partly unevidenced.
  • None of the 7 screenshots are described and there are no demo checks, so usability and visual quality rest on code alone, and the UI mixes Polish and English screens.
  • The social layer is thinner than pitched, with joining open to everyone and no matchmaking in the code, and measured unit test cases are zero.

Red flags

  • The deck presents weather, live traffic and AI features as current capabilities although no such code is in the repo.
Built during the event: yes: 97 commits by 2 authors, 2026-10-03 09:39 to 2026-10-04 08:49 UTC
Live demo: none found in the form or README
Council v9
Aclaude:glm-5.3-flash68.0100% agree
Bdots-studio/dots-3-note-preview:free88.550% agree
Cinclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-sante:free56.070% agree
Jclaude:glm-5.3–judge
Self-submitted and unverified: the result shown is the team's own claim. The council read an evidence pack built from the repo, its decks and docs; it didn't run the code or see the pitch.
The site is open source

The council, the evidence pack, the prompts and the queue are all on GitHub. If a review helped you, a star helps other teams find it.

Star on GitHub